Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RE, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Japan, and described on the customs invoice as “tuner,” “amplifier,” “turntable,” and “dual cassette deck.”
The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as individual components under the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as follows:
the “tuner” under item 685.24, dutiable at 7.7% ad val.;
the “amplifier” under item 684.70, dutiable at 5.9% ad val.;
the “turntable” under item 685.36, dutiable at 4.5% ad…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- KMW Johnson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Eureka Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993