Legal Opinion

Netting Co. v. Touscany

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 34,289PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The bill herein was filed to foreclose a claimed lien for labor and material furnished by plaintiff, under contract with defendant Amond H. Touscany, in the construction of the latter’s house. The other defendants were lien claimants, but their claims have been adjusted, and Mr. Touscany is now the sole defendant.

In the circuit, the alleged lien was held void for failure of plaintiff to furnish defendant owner with a sworn statement, required by 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14799. That section of the lien statute provides:

“The original contractor shall, whenever any payment of money shall become due…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnard v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kerr-Murray Manufacturing Co. v. Kalamazoo Heat, Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. F. M. Sibley Lumber Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Warner Elevator Manufacturing Co. v. Capitol Investment. Building & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Vander Horst v. Kalamazoo Apartments Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edward Gallagher v. Kathleen PershaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Nurmi v. BeardsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Canvasser Custom Builders, Inc. v. SeskinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Yerrington v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API