Legal Opinion
Shulansky v. Rodriguez
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 28, 1995No. 15153PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this action to enforce an administrative subpoena, the sole issue is whether the commissioner of banking exceeded the broad discretion conferred upon him by General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) §§ 36-21 and 36-4951 to require the production of documents relevant to the investigation of possible violations of the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (CUSA). The plaintiff, the banking commissioner of the state of Connecticut (commissioner), filed an application in the trial court to require the defendant, Rene *467Rodriguez,2 to comply with a subpoena duces tecum that had been served upon him. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- ETSI Pipeline Project v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartford County Sheriffs Department Communities Charities Ass'n v. BlumenthalConnecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Hartford County Sheriffs v. Blumenthal, No. Cv00-0093035-S (Jul. 31, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001