Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Lacroix

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove the following facts:

Mrs. Aurore Sirois, the mother of the plaintiff’s intestate, engaged the defendants to lay linoleum on certain floors in her home. One Nault, an employee of the defendants, and Moreau, his helper, performed this work. They had finished covering the floors and were about to return to the shop when Mrs. Sirois informed them that she wished to have the thresholds covered also. While making this request she was standing in the kitchen with the child in her arms. As Nault and Moreau stepped into the adjoining room to get the linoleum,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Masterson v. Berlin Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Warren v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  3. State v. HersomSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  4. Williams v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  5. Duncan v. Derry Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Niemi v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  2. Dane v. MacGregorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Finbar F. Creedon, P.P.A. v. Robert B. LoringCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  4. In re Estate of Infant FontaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API