State v. Bradley
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
KIDD, Justice.
Appellee Sara Bradley was indicted for possession of cocaine and marihuana. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.115, 481.121 (West Supp.1998). The district court granted her pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of her residence. The State appeals from that order. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp.1998). We will reverse.
1. Standard of review.
The challenged search was conducted pursuant to a warrant. No search warrant may issue unless supported by an affidavit setting forth substantial facts establishing probable cause for its issuance.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Swearingen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Serrano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Arrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- State v. Davila, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.