Legal Opinion

Latham v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided August 30, 2000No. 06-99-00048-CRPublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice CORNELIUS.

Kenneth Daniel Latham was convicted in a bench trial of possessing 400 grams or more of methamphetamine. His punishment was set at thirty-five years’ confinement. Latham raises three issues on appeal: 1) whether the trial court committed reversible error in denying Latham’s motion for continuance, 2) whether the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction, and 3) whether the punishment assessed is against the great weight of the evidence, and amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.

On the day of trial, Latham filed a sworn motion for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Robert McGruder v. Steven W. PuckettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Alberto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  2. Lemmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  3. Fluellen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. Buchanan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  5. Hartson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API