Legal Opinion
Yancey v. Fink
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1991No. Docket Nos. E007142, E007143PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
In this consolidated appeal, David W. Yancey (hereinafter, the purchaser) appeals from two orders in two separate actions: one sustaining a demurrer to his complaint without leave to amend; and the other authorizing the redemption of certain real property by respondents Lloyd Lewis and A1 Wilkins (the redemptioners). We dismiss in part and reverse in part.
Factual and Procedural Background
In 1985, the redemptioners were the owners of certain parcels of real property (the property), located in the County of San Bernardino. In that year, the Victor Valley County…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Associated Convalescent Enterprises v. Carl Marks & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pollock v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- D'AVOLA v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Austin v. ValverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Gonzalez v. ToewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hebert v. Los Angeles Raiders, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.