Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bagstad

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 13, 2010No. 09-0429/MCPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted review to determine whether the military judge abused his discretion in denying Appellant’s challenge for cause against Captain (Capt) Stojka, who sat with his subordinate on a court-martial panel composed of three members. We hold that the military judge did not err in denying the challenge for cause.

I

Contrary to his pleas, a special court-martial composed of members convicted Appellant of wrongfully using marijuana, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a (2006). The members sentenced…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. WiesenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  4. United States v. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  3. United States v. NashCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  4. United States v. SaukUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API