Page v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. While it may be error to refuse on motion to delete from the pleadings taken into the jury room a notation of the verdict (in this case, mistrial) on the former trial of the case, in which connection see 120 ALR Anno., pp. 460, 467, the rule generally is that “if defendant’s counsel wish such verdicts concealed from the jury, a request to this effect should be made at the proper time before the jury retire to their room.” Hudson v. Hudson, 90 Ga. 581 (7) (16 SE 349).
Submitted November 3, 1969 Decided November 24, 1969. Smith, Gardner, Wiggins, Geer & Brimberry, M. M. Wiggins,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Guinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Decker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Chandler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.