Legal Opinion

Chandler v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1977No. 54256PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:

1. "A motion to continue is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere unless it is clearly shown that he has abused his discretion... [Cits.] Where the moving party fails to make a proper showing of the requirements set forth in Code Ann. § 81-1410, the denial of a continuance motion cannot be said to be an abuse of discretion.” Jones v. State, 135 Ga. App. 893, 896 (219 SE2d 585). Accord, Scoggins v. State, 98 Ga. App. 360…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Munsford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Black v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Barrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Corbin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Bostick v. RickettsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Blair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Byrd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API