Legal Opinion
Castellani v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided January 6, 1937No. Claim No. 24321; Claim No. 24322; Claim No. 24323; Claim No. 24338; Claim No. 24365; Claim No. 24366Published
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
Each óf the above-entitled claims appears upon the calendar of this court for the Rochester district. Together they constitute six out of a group of fifty or more claims pending against the State all of which have their incidence in the disastrous floods of July 8, 1935.. By order to show cause the Attorney-General has moved to dismiss each of these claims upon the ground that they were not filed in accordance with the provisions of the Court of Claims Act as it read prior to the amendments of 1936 (Laws of 1936, chap. 775). It is undisputed that in each of these claims there was a complete…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hinds v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1932
- Hinds v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Consiglio v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Ortalano v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1934
- Hinds v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933