Legal Opinion

United States v. Cristobal Cervantes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 30, 2013No. 11-41385, 11-41407PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRADO, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Mark Anthony Milan, Cristobal Cervantes, and Luis Eduardo Alvarez were convicted on charges stemming from a sting operation conducted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Appellants, along with a fourth defendant who did not appeal, worked with an undercover agent to plan an armed home invasion with the aim of stealing a large quantity of drugs. The home invasion was a sham. Appellants were arrested on the day the invasion was set to happen and subsequently indicted on six counts. After a jury trial, Appellants were convicted on all six…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Gilbert IsgarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Walter ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Timothy Nelson Evans v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  5. United States v. Ebolose EghoborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API