Legal Opinion

Roe 1818 v. Bishop of Charleston, The

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 18, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00020Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Mary Roe 1818, ) Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-20-RMG ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) The Bishop of Charleston, A Corporation ) ORDER AND OPINION Sole, and the Bishop of the Diocese of ) Charleston, In His Official Capacity, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Before the Court are various motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants. (Dkt. Nos. 63, 64, 66, and 68). Also before the Court is a motion to strike filed by Defendants. (Dkt. No. 80). For the reasons stated below, the Court rules as follows.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Vermillion v. Woman's College of Due WestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API