Roe 1818 v. Bishop of Charleston, The
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Mary Roe 1818, ) Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-20-RMG ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) The Bishop of Charleston, A Corporation ) ORDER AND OPINION Sole, and the Bishop of the Diocese of ) Charleston, In His Official Capacity, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Before the Court are various motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants. (Dkt. Nos. 63, 64, 66, and 68). Also before the Court is a motion to strike filed by Defendants. (Dkt. No. 80). For the reasons stated below, the Court rules as follows.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Vermillion v. Woman's College of Due WestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.