Legal Opinion
Abreu-Mercedes v. Chater
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 17, 1996No. 94 Civ. 7578 (JGK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiff, Benigno Abreu-Mercedes, brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). After listening to the sworn testimony of the plaintiff and, Dr. Spatt, an impartial medical expert, and reviewing all the medical records submitted, on February 25, 1994, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) determined that the plaintiff was not entitled to a Period of Disability or Disability Insurance Benefits…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Joan M. Jones v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Juana DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Isabel RIVERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fonseca v. ChaterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Rivera v. ChaterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Charles McCallum v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Dombrowski v. ChaterDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997