Legal Opinion
Fonseca v. Chater
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 3, 1997No. 95-CV-0826A(H)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ARCARA, District Judge.
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Carol E. Heckman, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on March 18,1996. Both parties moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). On November 13, 1996, Magistrate Judge Heckman filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court grant defendant’s motion and deny plaintiff’s motion.
Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on November 27, 1996 and defendant filed a memorandum .of law in response thereto.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Washington v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
- Iannopollo v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Fonseca v. Columbia Gas Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998