Legal Opinion

Herrera v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1954No. 13733PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted on three counts of an indictment charging him with the transportation within the United States of aliens, knowing that they were in the United States in violation of law and having reasonable grounds to believe that their entry occurred less than three years prior to the transportation.1

The aliens in question were Mexicans who had clandestinely crossed the border into Southern California. The indictment was predicated on Section 8 of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended by Public Law No. 283, approved March 20, 1952, 66 Stat. p. 26, 8 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Berea College v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. United States v. de CadenaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Encarnacion MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Hilario Gonzalez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Jacques De Gorter, and Suze C. Degorter, as Individuals and as Co-Partners, Trading as Pelta Furs v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. SLOANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. Brigido Sanchez-MataCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API