Legal Opinion

United States v. de Cadena

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 6, 1952No. 10728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.

Defendants stand indicted for an alleged conspiracy to violate the immigration laws of the United States, to wit: Section 8 of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, Public Law 283, 82nd Congress, 2nd Ses*204sion, approved March 20, 1952; 8 U.S.C.A. § 144. The indictment is drawn upon the theory that among the acts proscribed by; the statute is that of knowingly transport-, ing within- the United States an alien not duly ..admitted to the United States by an immigration • officer, with the knowledge that such -alien last entered the United-States less than three…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henry Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Herrera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. People v. Bevilacqua, New York County Courts1958
  4. United States v. Orejel-TejedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961
  5. Herrera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API