United States v. de Cadena
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendants stand indicted for an alleged conspiracy to violate the immigration laws of the United States, to wit: Section 8 of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, Public Law 283, 82nd Congress, 2nd Ses*204sion, approved March 20, 1952; 8 U.S.C.A. § 144. The indictment is drawn upon the theory that among the acts proscribed by; the statute is that of knowingly transport-, ing within- the United States an alien not duly ..admitted to the United States by an immigration • officer, with the knowledge that such -alien last entered the United-States less than three…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Henry Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Herrera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- People v. Bevilacqua, New York County Courts1958
- United States v. Orejel-TejedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961
- Herrera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954