Legal Opinion

United States v. Brigido Sanchez-Mata

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1970No. 25304_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The Immigration officers lawfully stopped the ear driven by the defendant and lawfully interrogated the persons therein. Title 8, U.S.C., See. 1357.

The conversations with the backseat aliens were in the presence of the defendant and were not hearsay.

The evidence as to whether Sandoval (the illegally transported alien) was illegally in the Country was conflicting and was resolved by the jury whose verdict as triers of the fact this appellate court will not disturb. The admission of the evidence of simultaneous violations of transporting other aliens was net error. Gianotos v. United States (9…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robert Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Virginia Lawrence Bland and Raymond Lee Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Herrera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. Gianotos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Trinidad Terrazas-CarrascoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Germaine Haili, United States of America v. Earl K. H. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Hilario Gonzalez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Moises CantuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API