Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Manuel Acosta and Roberto Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1982No. 80-5318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this drug conspiracy and possession case, the government originally brought this appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 (1976), seeking review of the district court’s order granting the motion of defendants Jose Manuel Acosta and Roberto Rodriguez to suppress marijuana seized from a fishing vessel on which defendants were arrested. In granting the motion to suppress, the district court first held that the defendants possessed standing to assert a fourth amendment violation in the search of the vessel and the seizure of the marijuana; it then found that the search and seizure was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Donald R. Lord v. Alvin M. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. Lawton Scott MockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Norman R. Simons and Catherine Simons v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Peirick v. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Athletics DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. David KirkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allstate Beverage Company, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2023
  5. Peirick, Debbie A. v. IN Univ Purdue AthleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API