Legal Opinion
McKown v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 18, 1996No. 2-95-509-CRPublishedCited by 430 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Kimberly Denise McKown appeals the denial of her motion to suppress evidence at her trial for possession of a controlled substance. Because we find that this appeal does not concern an appealable order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Before trial, McKown filed a motion to suppress any evidence seized pursuant to her arrest because she claimed the arrest warrant was issued without probable cause. As a result, McKown also wanted to suppress any statements she made after the arrest. The trial court denied the motion on October 12, 1995. McKown filed a notice of…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Apolinar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Workman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- United States v. Don Martin, Doma Corporation and Caprock Services CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Jose Manuel Acosta and Roberto RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by430 opinions
- Wright v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
- Ex Parte Shumake, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Bridle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Benford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
425 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.