Legal Opinion
Sientki v. Haffner
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOHEY, District Judge.
Two motions are here considered; one to dismiss a third párty complaint, the other to quash a subpoena duces tecum.
The Motion to Dismiss
The plaintiff’s intestate died as the result of injuries sustained when he was struck by a bale which fell' from a pile near which he was working as a cooper on Pier C in Hoboken, N. J. The plaintiff sued the Haffners and Braun Importing Co. alleging that the deceased’s death was caused by their negligence. The Haffners filed a third party complaint, which was later amended, against American Export Lines, Inc. (hereafter called…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Public Service Elec. and Gas Co. v. WaldroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. McKenzie Electric Cooperative, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1964
- Slechta v. Great Northern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
- Handley v. Tecon CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1959
- Cantlin v. PavlovichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Santomassino v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.