Legal Opinion

Patzke v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1962No. Docket 1, Calendar 48,724PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This Federal employers’ liability action resulted in a jury verdict of $118,000 for plaintiff; The trial court granted defendant’s motion' for new trial, stating:

“It appearing to the court that for the reasons set forth in defendant’s motion for a new trial and because it is the court’s belief that a miscarriage of justice has resulted, a new trial is and the same is hereby ordered.”

Plaintiff appeals, contending the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial.

Plaintiff testified that he had been thrown off the top of a box car (December 3, 1955) by a defective hand brake.

Defendan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hoskin-Morainville Paper Co. v. Bates Valve Bag Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Porth v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kailimai v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Benmark v. SteffenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Arrington v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Carpenter v. ClevelandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Humphrey v. BAY REFINING COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API