Ehman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
William Ehman petitions for review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that reversed the order of an unemployment compensation referee and concluded that the pension that Ehman receives from the Latrobe Steel Company (Employer) should be 100 percent deductible from the unemployment compensation benefits for which he is eligible. For the reasons stated, we reverse.
Ehman worked for Employer for 37 years, until his last day of work on April 8, 1999. He also worked for the United Steelworkers of America (Union), serving as the elected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Sheets v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Lopata v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Cugini v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Morris v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.