Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 2003Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

I dissent. The record reflects that during settlement negotiations the employees waived their scheduled COLA in exchange *1265for a wage increase and a lump sum payment into their pension fund. Forbearance equals consideration; therefore, the employees contributed to the pension plan within the meaning of Section 404(d)(2) of the law. The Board as the ultimate fact finder so found, and the Board properly applied Ehman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 776 A.2d 1031 (Pa.Cmwlth.), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 567 Pa. 767, 790 A.2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ehman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API