Legal Opinion

Lee v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 28, 1950No. 33161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

1. Where a county commissioner is in possession of . a county automobile assigned to him for his exclusive use by virtue of his office, but such possession is not in his own right but solely as an officer of the county, such commissioner may not maintain an action in trover in his own name to recover the automobile, even though the automobile was wrongfully taken from such commissioner’s possession, as the commissioner’s possession was that of the county. Mitchell v. Georgia & Alabama Ry., 111 Ga. 760 (36 S. E. 971); and see Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 41 Ga. App. 794(6) (154 S. E.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Georgia & Alabama RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Greene & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Paschal v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Eibel v. Mechanics Loan & Savings Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Andrew v. George Muse Clothing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. Pulaski CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API