Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Pulaski County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1952No. 34080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSxjtton, C.J.

In special ground 1 of the motion for a new trial, the defendant assigns error on a ruling of the trial judge allowing the plaintiff to withhold from the juiy certain parts of both the direct and cross-examinations of W. A. Sapp and J. F. Lee on depositions taken at the instance of the plaintiff. Special grounds 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, and 16 of the motion complain of the exclusion of this same testimony when offered by the defendant on the trial of the case before the jury. To determine whether this evidence was relevant to any issue in the case, the trial judge allowed both…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blair v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. City Bank of Macon v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  4. Cox v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. Sappington v. RimesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paulk v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  3. Thomas v. Emory Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Harris v. City of Chattanooga, Tenn.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  5. Staci Shawn Thomas v. the Emory Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API