Legal Opinion

Cedzidlo v. Marriott International, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 20, 2010No. 1-09-1924 RelPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lampkin

Defendants and third-party plaintiffs Marriott International, Inc. (Marriott), and Renaissance Hotel Operating Company (Renaissance) appeal from the trial court’s grant of the motion to dismiss filed by third-party defendants, Torvac, Inc. (Torvac), and Darling International, Inc. (Darling). Marriott and Renaissance argue the trial court should not have dismissed their third-party complaint, which was filed after leave of court had expired but before the expiration of the statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 2, 2007, plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Steinbrecher v. SteinbrecherIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ragan v. Columbia Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Addison Industrial Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Harshman v. DePhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parkway Bank and Trust Co. v. MeseljevicAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. VC&M, LTD v. AndrewsIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Besic v. Lattof ChevroletAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Besic v. Lattof Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API