Legal Opinion
Chazin v. Lieberman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1990No. 89 Civ. 5968 (RPP)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., District Judge.
Defendants Elizabeth Lieberman and Harold Lieberman move for an order quashing deposition subpoenas duces tecum served by plaintiff on 12 nonparty institutions, primarily banks, for records relating to defendants or members of their family, or in the alternative, limiting the scope of the subpoenas, on the grounds that the records sought are (a) not relevant to the pending action, and (b) threaten the privacy interests of defendants. The motion was heard on January 23, 1990. At that time, plaintiff, counsel for moving defendants and counsel for Bank…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Nova Products, Inc. v. Kisma Video, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Syposs v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Chemical Bank v. DanaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. CamarataDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.