Legal Opinion
Concerned Citizens Around Murphy v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 4, 2010No. Civil Action No.: 08-4986PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiff Concerned Citizens Around Murphy (CCAM)’s First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability and Standing (see R. Doc. 30), and defendant Murphy Oil USA, Inc. (Murphy)’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Standing (see R. Doc. 41). CCAM’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Murphy’s motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
CCAM, a Louisiana non-profit organization, brought this action on behalf of its members under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a). CCAM alleges that…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- John Doe v. DeRay MckessonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Utah Physic. for Healthy Env't v. Diesel Power GearCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Little Tchefuncte River Ass'n v. Artesian Utility Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Aarp v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.