Legal Opinion

White v. Nuckolls

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1910No. 5679PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Pueblo District Court — Hon. John H. Voorhees, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

delivered the 'opinion of the court:

The parties to this proceeding each claim priorities to the use of water from a natural stream known as Long Branch, and the important question presented for the determination of the court below, was, which party had the prior right to the use of such water.

Defendant in error (plaintiff below) instituted an action to enjoin plaintiff in error (as defendant) from diverting and interfering with her use for domestic and irrigation purposes of one and one-half cubic feet of water per second of time, from the stream in question. On filing the complaint a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scovill v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. New Mercer Ditch Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Medano Ditch Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Platte Valley Irrigation Co. v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  5. Dunne v. StotesburySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. City & County of Denver v. SheriffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  3. Ireland v. WynkoopColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  5. Arnold v. RoupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API