Shell Pipe Line Corporation v. Curtis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
CORN, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by reason of defendant’s negligence. The case heretofore has been considered by this court, and a decision rendered reversing the trial court’s order and judgment sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition. See Curtis v. Shell Pipe Line Corp., Okl., 265 P.2d 488.
The amended petition, upon which the case was tried, alleged plaintiff's ownership of a 50 acre farm principally devoted to pasturing cattle; defendant owned an oil and gas pipe line traversing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minnetonka Oil Co. v. HavilandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- M.-K.-T. R. Co. v. EmbreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Bates v. WinkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Belt v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Grand Distributing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Braden v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Bouziden v. Alfalfa Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Valley View Angus Ranch, Inc. v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.