Legal Opinion

Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. James

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1888No. 162PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. In equity, to restrain' infringement of letters patent. Decree dismissing the bill.. Complainant appealed. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford

This is a suit of equity, brought by the Yale Lock Manufacturing Company, a Connecticut corporation, against Thomas L. James, to recover for the alleged infringement of .reissued letters-patent' No. 8783, granted to the plaintiff, as assignee óf S. N.- Brooks, administrator of L. Yale, Jr., deceased, July 1, 1879, for an “improvement in post-office boxes,” on an application for a reissue filed May 23, 1879, (the origi-nal patent, No. 119,212, having been granted* to Silas N. Brooks, administrator of- Yale, September 19, 1871,. on an application filed September 30, 1868; and having been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. James v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Parker & Whipple Co. v. Yale Clock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Manufacturing Co. v. LaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freeman v. AsmusSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. People v. HatcherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. Cornell v. WeidnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Craig v. Michigan Lubricator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API