Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Weidner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 1888No. 240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Bill in equity for the infringement of letters patent. Decree dismissing the bill. Complainant appealed. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This was a bill in equity for the infringement of a second reissue of letters patent. When the facts are understood, the case is clear.

The original patent, issued August 29, 1871, No. 118,517, was for an “ improvement in metallic bushings for the bungs of casks, etc., and in wrenches for operating the same;" and described the bushings thus: “ A tapering thimble or ring of metal, provided with a flange, ó, at its larger end, and having a screw-thread, o, on its outer surface, which screw-thread is cast on the bushing in the mould, and is capable of immediate use without other finishing. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. CornellSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McCreary v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Guardian Trust & Deposit Co. v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API