Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bonham v. Farmer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 13, 1929No. 12681Published

1DissentJustice Coti-iran

(dissenting) : The plaintiffs, a law. firm under the name and style of Bonham, Price & Poag, practicing law in the City of Greenville, brought this action against the defendant Mattie G. Farmer, as executrix of-the will of B. D. Goldsmith, deceased, and Mattie G. Farmer and her daughter Willie Blake Farmer, individually, upon a written contract entered into- between them and the executrix, dated November 1$, 1925, by which the law firm was engaged to represent the executrix, “in all matters affecting the settlement of the estate of Blake Goldsmith, deceased, including any litigation now…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Tenney v. . BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Louque v. DejanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API