Legal Opinion

State v. ROFFLER

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 2010No. 1090007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to determine an issue of first impression: whether in the 21st century an indictment that charges theft of funds in a certain dollar amount, in violation of § 13A-8-3, Ala.Code 1975, but does not designate the medium of exchange1 of those funds is legally sufficient.

Facts and Procedural History

Mitchell Roffler and Michelle Roffler operated a furniture store, Gulf Coast Furniture, in Mobile. The Rofflers offered customers the option of purchasing furniture through a layaway plan. A customer participating in the layaway…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Ex Parte HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  4. State v. SeaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1830
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Angela Natalie Fox A/K/A Angela Natalie Jarvis v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  4. State v. ROFFLERSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. State v. ROFFLERCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API