Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Harper

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 27, 1991No. 1901019PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the petition for writ of certiorari in this case primarily to review this question: Was the indictment, which tracked the language of the statute in alleging that Henry Mack Harper "unlawfully" distributed cocaine in violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-12-211, fatally defective because it did not allege that the offense was "knowingly" committed? This question was raised for the first time by the petition filed in this Court. We also review a secondary question, whether the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly determined that Harper's ineffective assistance of counsel claim was…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Sullens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API