Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 2016No. 1150089Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAIN, Justice.

We granted certiorari review to determine whether there was a fatal variance between the indictment, which charged James R. Hall with theft of “currency,” and the evidence produced at trial, which established theft of the funds by means of depositing a check. We conclude that there was no material variance in the indictment and the evidence, and we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Hall was the “commander” of the Houston County chapter, Chapter 87, of the Disabled American Veterans (“the DAV”). In 2013, Hall had issued to himself…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ex Parte CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. House v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. United States v. James A. WomackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API