Legal Opinion

Columbus Motor Express, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1932No. 23615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This proceeding was instituted on February 18, 1932, by the Columbus Motor Express, Inc., plaintiff in error here, filing a complaint with the commission against one Braddock, holder of certificate No. 1079, which complaint sets forth certain violations of the statute committed by Braddock’s predecessor in title. The complainant likewise made application to the commission to reopen a case wherein Evans & Son had theretofore filed an application to sell, and Braddock to purchase, certificate No. 1079.

Briefly stated historically, the record tends to prove that in 1924 said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miami Valley Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Z., C. & W. Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Co-Operative Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Wrightesmith v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API