Legal Opinion

Z., C. & W. Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1928No. 21172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At,t/en, J.

Did the Public Utilities Commission act unlawfully and unreasonably in revoking the certificate1? Section 614-87, General Code, provides that:

“The commission may at any time for a good cause * * * revoke, alter or amend any certificate issued under the provisions of this chapter.”

It has been previously held by this court that failure to comply with certain statutory provisions relative to motor transportation companies constitutes “a good cause” for revocation of the certificate. Miami Valley Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 117 Ohio St., 311, 158 N. E., 591;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miami Valley Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Minerva-Canton Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbus Motor Express, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cannonball Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lattavo Brothers, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API