Legal Opinion

Coster v. Crookham

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 17, 1991No. 89-1075PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This is an action for civil damages brought by income and remainder beneficiaries of an inter vivos trust. Defendants are the trustee, the trustee’s investment partner, the lender of a company in which the trustee and partner invested, and a bank which served the trust. A jury allowed recovery on many, though not all, of plaintiffs’ several theories of liability. This appeal and cross-appeal present a wide variety of related questions. We cannot resolve all issues on the basis of the special verdicts and must remand some matters for retrial.

John Coster and his wife Eleanor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Northrup v. Miles Homes, Inc. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Berryhill v. HattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Parks v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. McClure v. Walgreen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Ezzone v. RiccardiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Beeman v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation FundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. Mercer v. Pittway Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API