Legal Opinion
Triple E, Inc. v. Hendrix and Dail, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 16, 2001No. 3285PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, Judge:
Triple E filed this action against Hendrix and Dail, Inc. (H & D), alleging breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, negligent misrepresentation and negligence. The jury returned a verdict of $47,025 for Triple E. H & D appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
Triple E is a family farm operated primarily by Marty Easier. In the early 1990s, Triple E’s principal crop was tobacco. In 1994, Triple E purchased 8,000 pounds of ChlorO-Pic. 1 Chlor-O-Pic is a chemical fumigant used to suppress black shank…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Gherna v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Interco Inc. v. Randustrial Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Fields v. Melrose Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Torres v. Northwest Engineering Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Bussian v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Jones v. Ram Medical, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Eaton Corp. v. Trane Carolina PlainsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
- Dickson v. Atlas Roofing Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.