Legal Opinion
Interco Inc. v. Randustrial Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1976No. 36784PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Interco, Inc. (Interco) filed suit against defendant-respondent Randustrial Corporation (Randustrial) alleging breach of warranty on a product sold by Randustrial to Interco. Jury verdict was for defendant Randustrial, and Interco has appealed on the basis that the trial court erred in failing to find that Interco was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The core issue is whether Inter-co established as a matter of law that Ran-dustrial was guilty of a breach of an express warranty under § 400.2-313 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code and that Interco was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hawkins Construction Co. v. Matthews Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- General Supply and Equipment Co., Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Speed Fastners, Inc. v. NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Beverly Cole Anita S. Perkins Jewell P. Lowe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.