Legal Opinion

People v. Tambara

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1923No. Crim. No. 2577PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONREY, J., pro tem.

The defendant was charged with the crime of embezzlement, by an information filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, in the charging part of which it was alleged that the defendant, on or about the ninth day of October, 1920, was entrusted by one F. Hachiyama with certain bonds issued by the Japanese imperial government, the property of said Hachiyama, and of the aggregate value of $1,350, and that the said defendant having then and there received said personal property as bailee, and while he was so entrusted and in the possession of said…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Fiedler v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API