Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Walston & Co.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided March 12, 1973No. 55PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

The complaint filed in the above-captioned action appeared on its face to raise questions of fact common to the actions previously transferred by the Panel under Section 1407 to the Western District of Oklahoma for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings before Judge Roszel C. Thomsen. See In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation, 328 F.Supp. 221 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1971); 331 F.Supp. 559 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1971); 342 F.Supp. 758 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1972); 344 F.Supp. 1404 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.1972); 352 F.Supp. 962 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. Nov. 16, 1972); 352 F.Supp. 964…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  2. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
  3. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  4. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
  5. In re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation. Randolph Phillips v. Jack L. Clark and Anne ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
  3. Phillips v. ClarkUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  4. In re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API