Legal Opinion

Bresler v. Tietjen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 12, 1968No. 51781PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Chief Justice.

This suit for a declaratory judgment was instituted by nineteen optometrists against the members of the Missouri State Board of Optometry. They allege that a portion of § 336.110 (all statutory references are to RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.) is unconstitutional, and that four rules promulgated by the defendants under the rule-making power given them in § 336.160 are invalid. The judgment of the trial court was in favor of plaintiffs and defendants have appealed. We have jurisdiction because one of the questions presented involves the construction of a provision of the State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lentine v. State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. In Re Hughes v. State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. In Re Rust v. Missouri Dental BoardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Ketring v. SturgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Utah Restaurant Ass'n v. Davis County Board of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Tichenor v. Missouri State Lottery CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  4. At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. WallemannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Associated General Contractors of Missouri v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API