Legal Opinion

Free v. Little

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1907No. 1673PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Arpead from District Court, Third District; W. C. Hall, Judge. Suit by Susie M. Free against Fannie Maria Little and others. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFeign, J.

This is an action for specific performance based upon a written option or agreement. The plaintiff (hereinafter called respondent), in her complaint, in substance alleges: That on the 6th day of January, -1898, James T. Little was the owner in fee of certain real estate in Salt Lake City, Utah, describing it. That said Little died on the 20th day of February, 1898, leaving a last will and testament, and that the defendants (hereafter styled appellants) are now the owners of the property described. That respondent within the time mentioned in the writing, offered to pay the appellants the sum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heirs of Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  2. Wadge v. KittlesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Graybill v. BrughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
  4. Harris v. DouglasIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Gault v. HoaglandIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cutwright v. Union Savings & Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Rosenow v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. McNeil v. McNeilUtah Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API