Legal Opinion

McNeil v. McNeil

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1922No. 3850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court seeking to compel specific performance of a written- contract entered into between himself and the defendant William R. McNeil for the conveyance of certain real property situate in what is known as North Canyon in Davis county, Utah.

The admitted facts upon which the judgment and decree of the distrifet court were predicated are substantially as follows:

On August 1, 1902, the defendant William R. McNeil entered into a contract with the state of Utah, acting through the State Board of Land Commissioners, for the purchase of the lands at a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JicklingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Robertson v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Young v. CorlessUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Beebe v. LyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCown v. GellerNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Federal Land Bank of Berkeley v. SorensonUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gigliotto v. AlbergoUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kier v. CondrackUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kier v. CondrackUtah Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API