Legal Opinion

Tidd v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1928No. 4968PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Bailey Lee, J.

Suit for damages alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligent collision with plaintiff’s automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. From an order granting defendant a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Insufficiency of the evidence was one of the numerous grounds specified in support of the motion, but the record does not disclose upon what ground the new trial was awarded. Respondent urges none other than insufficiencies of the evidence, in effect admitting the remaining grounds meritless.

At the outset appellant contends that Lowe v. Long, 5 Ida. 122, 47 Pac. 93, Wood Livestock Co. v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. RidleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Meinberg v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Bernier v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Buckle v. McConaghyIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Turner v. First Nat. Bank of BancroftIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. O'DELL v. BasabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Rosenberg v. ToetlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Sanchotena v. Tower Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Walker v. DistlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Poston v. HollarIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API