Legal Opinion

Neal v. Wilson County Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 27, 1927No. 11,971PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Wilson County Bank of Fredonia, Kansas, was plaintiff and Neal was defendant in the district court; they are so referred to hereafter.

The action was on two promissory notes and the case was tried to a jury. At the close of defendant’s evidence, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict, and judgment was so entered. Defendant brings the case here for review and asks for a supersedeas.

The main question is,, was the court right in directing a verdict? All else is subsidiary to this.

Defendant admits that he signed the notes, and does not deny that he has not paid them. His…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Hukill v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Miller v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stull v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. People v. RamirezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. Werner v. SchraderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. Gallegos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API