Legal Opinion

United States v. Orr Water Ditch Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 14, 2004No. Nos. 03-16654, 03-16941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.

In this case, we consider whether a Nevada statute providing for an automatic *1079stay of the State Engineer’s decisions applies to federal proceedings under the Orr Ditch Decree.

Because we find that Nev.Rev.Stat. § 533.450 is an integral part of Nevada water law rather than a generally applicable rule of civil procedure, we conclude that it does.

I. Background

The underlying case arises from a 1944 federal court decree quieting title to certain water rights in the Truckee River. The Truckee River originates in California, flows into Nevada, and terminates in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Coufal Abogados Eric Coufal v. At&t, Inc. Lucent Technologies Inc.,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Orr Water Ditch Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Kaltwasser v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Kaltwasser v. Cingular Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Lindstrom v. Polaris, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API